Series of Tax Court Orders Allowing Nonconsensual Depositions by the IRS: Aberration or Trend?
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJGzQBRsH-tOL-Ot91x-xATQKMQPKjUhHe9Z8GfN4NzhtEYpq84dD1iCBpzBJm5UU_e2KIvfjwaECb7G8sPoY4ZUTvOWG9Sc1fumj_41Hkzy7gGHxf1wPAoKi6mpnDZHPesbx1G7fLYOjrZh1jx4JiGpOwhyeL-TnJmNEUDMUeQm_081JYj0OujIofOw/w516-h269/Blog%20Images%20(14).png)
Taxpayers in tax disputes with the IRS can seek judicial review in any one of three courts, but they often choose the Tax Court. This makes sense because the Tax Court is favorable to taxpayers in many ways. For instance, the parties must work cooperatively to exchange evidence, narrow issues, and agree on facts, and pre-trial discovery demands are often minimal. Things have started changing, though, particularly when it comes to cases involving conservation easements. This article explains the IRS’s main data-gathering tools during audits, pre-trial discovery actions, general limitations on depositions of potential witnesses, and three recent Tax Court Orders allowing the IRS to conduct non-consensual depositions of various persons affiliated with partnerships that donated easements. Read the full article here. About Hale E. Sheppard HALE E. SHEPPARD, Esq. (B.S., M.A., J.D., LL.M., LL.M.T.) is a Shareholder in the Tax Controversy Section of Chamberlain Hrdlicka and Chair of the Intern...