Prose by Tax Pros

The IRS has been riding high recently because of several Tax Court victories on “technical” issues in conservation easement disputes. However, several signs exist that the tide might be turning. One of these is the recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Pine Mountain Preserve, LLLP. This article explains the general rules related to conservation easement donations, critical facts from the case, analysis by the Tax Court, overlooked aspects of the initial decision, recent rulings by the Court of Appeals, issues that the Tax Court must now decide on remand, and the positive aspects of the case thus far for taxpayers making charitable donations. Click here to read the full article. About Hale E. Sheppard HALE E. SHEPPARD, Esq. (B.S., M.A., J.D., LL.M., LL.M.T.) is a Shareholder in the Tax Controversy Section of Chamberlain Hrdlicka and Chair of the International Tax Group.

  The IRS is sending mixed messages when it comes to potential resolution of disputes involving partnerships that engaged in a so-called syndicated conservation easement transaction (SCET). On one hand, the IRS has taken several enforcement actions recently, which make it procedurally  impossible for an individual partner to voluntarily resolve matters with the IRS and remain penalty-free by submitting a qualified amended return (QAR). On the other hand, the IRS commissioner issued two news releases in November and December, warning taxpayers of increased  enforcement activities and “encouraging” them to file QARs. This apparent inconsistency has many in the tax community confused and unable to properly advise partners, partnerships, and others. The good news is that the regulations seem to grant the commissioner authority to modify the QAR rules as necessary. This article reviews SCET issues; explains ongoing enforcement tools; summarizes recent IRS announcements urging ...