Fee Simple Charitable Donations Instead of Conservation Easements
The IRS has been attacking for several years what it has labeled syndicated conservation easement transactions (“SCETs”). Among the many weapons employed by the IRS are identifying SCETs as “listed transactions” in Notice 2017-10, 2017-4 IRB 544, launching a “compliance campaign” consisting of dozens of specialized Revenue Agents, featuring SCETs on the IRS’s “dirty dozen” list, and engaging in a widespread practice of claiming that tax deductions related to SCETs should be $0 and imposing severe penalties.
Assaults on SCETs are now common knowledge, but what many fail to realize is that the IRS does not limit itself. Indeed, the IRS has also been challenging fee-simple donations of property to charities for years, applying many of the same techniques used more recently against SCETs.
This article examines a relatively obscure case from yesteryear, Terrene Investments, whose importance likely will increase as tax disputes involving SCETs and fee-simple property donations increase. This case demonstrates that the IRS has a history of taking extreme positions, many of which ultimately cannot be supported before the Tax Court.
About Hale E. Sheppard